Iraqis Forbidden to work for Some US Contractors
The New York Times finally broke the story on Saturday of the US rebuilding efforts in Iraq being overly expensive because there is a failure to use experienced, reasonably priced Iraqi contractors. The situation is even worse than the Times suggested, however. It isn’t just that some contracts are going to high-priced American firms. Rather, in some instances Iraqis may be being positively discriminated against as “security risks.” So first they were supposed to dance in the streets at the US presence, and now they cannot even be trusted to rebuild their own country? Here is what an observer in Iraq says:
“[Some] American subcontractors here . . . who are working for . . . US
contractors . . . are prohibited from using Iraqi labor, contractors, or
equipment for some US military jobs. Iraqi nationals are considered a
security risk at some sites, so Indian and Sri Lankan laborers are brought
in from Kuwait. I don’t know how extensive this is, or what percentage of
military projects it applies to. Iraqi equipment (such as trucks and cranes)
are also considered a risk, so some companies are bring in equipment from
Kuwait (checked for bombs before entering Iraq – this simplifies the convoy
process and means the equipment does not need to be checked again after
arriving at the site) and elsewhere instead of using and paying Iraqi
companies and operators. I heard from a reliable source that the US military
has a list of nationalities prohibited from working on (some?) military
sites in Iraq, a list that now includes IRAQIS! Aside from the usual
suspects (Cubans, Vietnamese, Sudanese, etc), Chinese are also curiously
included. I understand why some foreign contracting companies are hesitant
to use Iraqi companies – many are fly-by-night operations, other simply
don’t know how to work with Westerners (often a lack of Western-style
accounting procedures and supervising, poor quality-control, inability to
provide quick quotes, etc). But, it also appears that institutional
hindrances are being put on reconstruction companies that might want to use
Iraqi labor. I have heard of competitive Iraqi bids rejected because they are
‘Iraqi,’ and hence a possible security risk. The British and American
militaries (I’ve heard, no one will confirm this for me) won’t use Iraqi
cooks or even let them near kitchens – fear of poisoning.“
For other stories on contracts see
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news
?tmpl=story&cid=68&ncid=68&e=2&u=/nyt/20031004/ts_nyt/
questionsareraisedonawardingofcontractsiniraq
and
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/
americas/story.jsp?story=450118