Palestine – Informed Comment https://www.juancole.com Thoughts on the Middle East, History and Religion Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:30:07 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.10 Palestinian-Americans Help Make the US Great: A Reply to Giuliani at the Trumpie Madison Square Garden Hatefest https://www.juancole.com/2024/10/palestinian-americans-giuliani.html Mon, 28 Oct 2024 04:15:24 +0000 https://www.juancole.com/?p=221222 Ann Arbor (Informed Comment) – The Great Trump Three Hours of Hate at Madison Square Garden on Sunday included a fatally unfunny comedian calling Puerto Ricans garbage and other racist swill directed at African-Americans, Hispanics and other groups. Trump alleged that a violent Venezuelan prison gang has taken over Times Square, which bears the same relationship to reality as his running mate J.D. Vance’s slurs against Haitians.

Alex Galbraith at Salon reports that disgraced former New York mayor, Rudi Giuliani, went out of his way to bash Palestinians. Giuliani has been ordered to turn over most of his wealth to Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss, African-American election workers whom he defamed with hate speech and false allegations. He has been disbarred for his role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election.

Giuliani alleged that Hamas trains Palestinian toddlers at two years old to hate Americans: “The Palestinians are taught to kill us at two-years old.”

In his fact-free universe, he alleged that Kamala Harris is attempting to bring Palestinian refugees to the US, saying, “She wants to bring them to you.” He added, “They may have good people. I’m sorry I don’t take a risk with people who are taught to kill Americans at two.”

Since Giuliani’s own children are embarrassed by his descent into whatever that is, he may not be much in touch with them or remember much about them. But my recollection is that when you tell two-year-olds to do something, they typically reply “No!” Actually I think that is their standard response to most assertions, though they will say “yes” if you ask them if they want to go to a toy store or go see a cartoon at the movies.

I actually know something about Palestinians and their history. See my new book, Gaza Yet Stands.

Let’s just recall who Giuliani is talking about when he talks about Palestinians in America, who are listed at Wikipedia. John H. Sununu, who served both as governor of New Hampshire (1983–89) and as George H. W. Bush’s chief of staff in the White House, had a Greek-Palestinian ancestor from Jerusalem. His son, John E. Sununu, served as a senator for New Hampshire. The Sununus are Republicans.

Gibran Hamdan played in the NFL for the Washington Redskins. Tarek Saleh also played in the NFL for the Cleveland Browns.

We have Hashem El Serag, a renowned medical researcher on liver cancer who chairs the Medicine Department at Baylor University. I don’t know about you, but I want Dr. El Serag here and working on treatments for liver cancer and other diseases. He’s a million times more useful to America than a scoundrel like Giuliani.

Then there is retired Col. Peter Mansoor, a professor of history at the Ohio State University, who served in Iraq and was part of General David Petraeus’s brain trust there. He is half Palestinian.

Click Here to donate to Informed Comment by Paypal
or Personal checks should be made out to Juan Cole and sent to me at:

    Juan Cole
    P. O. Box 4218,
    Ann Arbor, MI 48104-2548
    USA
    (Remember, make the checks out to “Juan Cole” or they can’t be cashed)

Justin Amash represented Michigan’s Third Congressional District from 2011 to 2021. Amash was a Republican but became a Libertarian to protest Trumpism. That is, this Palestinian American is a more loyal and patriotic American than Giuliani can ever dream of being.

Or DJ Khaled, who responded to Trump’s visa ban and wall-building this way, “Bless up 🙏 I am a Muslim American love is the 🔑 love is the answer. It’s so amazing to see so many people come together in love ! I pray for everyone I pray we all love and live in peace .. #NoBanNoWall 🙏.”

DJ Khaled once took his family on a trip across America, visiting numerous cities, out of love for his country. He raps peace and love, and said that the lack of love in Trump is what repelled him.

DJ Khaled, “God Did”

Then we have Dean Obeidallah, an actually funny American comedian and savvy political commentator whose father hailed from the British Mandate of Palestine.

Or take Bella Hadid, the Palestinian-American supermodel who loves America so much that she moved to Texas and adopted a cowboy lifestyle.

Or her sister Gigi, also a supermodel, and an activist in encouraging voting. Tommy Hilfiger went so far as to suggest that Gigi Hadid could help create a love between the US and the Middle East.

While you wouldn’t want to underestimate the influence of a dynamic supermodel, that hope may be unrealistic. Still, no one thinks Rudi Giuliani has the potential to create peace between anyone and anyone else. It is Gigi Hadid who is the real American, Palestinian heritage and all.

]]>
Meta’s Oversight Board rules “From the River to the Sea” isn’t Hate Speech https://www.juancole.com/2024/09/metas-oversight-speech.html Thu, 26 Sep 2024 04:06:06 +0000 https://www.juancole.com/?p=220703

Company Should Address Root Causes of Censorship of Palestine Content

( Human Rights Watch ) – Earlier this month, Meta’s Oversight Board found that three Facebook posts containing the phrase “From the River to the Sea” did not violate Meta’s content rules and should remain online.

The majority of the Oversight Board members concluded that the phrase, widely used at protests to show solidarity with Palestinians, is not inherently a violation of Meta’s policies on Hate Speech, Violence and Incitement, or Dangerous Organizations and Individuals (DOI). In line with Human Rights Watch’s submission, it affirmed that while the phrase can have different meanings, it amounts to protected speech under international human rights law and should not, on its own, be a basis for removal, enforcement, or review of content under Meta’s policies. Meta created the board as an external body to appeal moderation decisions and provide non-binding policy guidance.

A minority of board members recommended imposing a blanket ban on use of the phrase unless there are clear signals it does not constitute glorification of Hamas. Such a ban would be inconsistent with international human rights standards, amounting to an excessive restriction on protected speech.

The board’s decision upholds free expression, but Meta has a broader problem of censoring protected speech about Palestine on its platforms. A 2023 Human Rights Watch report found that Meta was systemically censoring Palestine content and that broad restrictions on content relating to groups that Meta puts on its DOI list often resulted in the censorship of protected speech. Meta has said that core human rights principles have guided its crisis response measures since October 7. But its heavy reliance on automated detection systems fails to accurately assess context, even when posts explicitly oppose violence.


Digital imagining of “From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be Free,” Dream / Dreamland v3 / Clip2Comic, 2024.

For instance, on July 19, Human Rights Watch posted a video on Instagram and Facebook with a caption in Arabic that read: “Hamas-led armed groups committed numerous war crimes and crimes against humanity against civilians during the October 7 assault on southern Israel.” Meta’s automated tools “incorrectly” removed the post for violating its DOI policy. Formal appeals were unsuccessful, and the content was only restored after informal intervention.

Meta should address the systemic issues at the heart of its wrongful removal of protected speech about Palestine. Amending its flawed policies, strengthening context-based review, and providing more access to data to facilitate independent research are essential to protecting free expression on its platforms.

Via Human Rights Watch

]]>
Woman, Life, Freedom: Rachel, Shireen, Mahsa and Ayşenur https://www.juancole.com/2024/09/freedom-shireen-aysenur.html Fri, 13 Sep 2024 04:15:55 +0000 https://www.juancole.com/?p=220514

A person can only be born in one place. However, he may die several times elsewhere: in the exiles and prisons, and in a homeland transformed by the occupation and oppression into a nightmare. -Mahmoud Darwish

Newark, Del. (Special to Informed Comment; Feature) – A few days before the invasion of Iraq by American forces under G.W.  Bush, on March 16, 2003, a young woman from Seattle, Washington, who had gone to Rafah, in Gaza to help Palestinians halt the demolition of homes died under the bulldozer of the Israeli army.  

Her name was Rachel Corrie. 

She was 23 years old. She was a member of the pro-Palestinian International Solidarity Movement (ISM) 

Her parents fought the judiciary system in Israel for two decades to no avail.  The court rejected their appeals, and no one was prosecuted.  It is the usual case in Israel, the only “democracy” in the Middle East.

On May 11, 2022, the renowned Palestinian American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, while reporting at the Jenin refugee camp and having reported from the occupied territories for nearly 25 years, was shot in the neck by IDF while reporting for Al Jazeera.   It took more than a year for the Israeli officials to admit that their army was responsible for her death.   Was anyone put on trial for her murder?  No. 

She was wearing a blue vest with the word Press on it.  An Israeli solider shot her just below her helmet.  While her funeral was being held, all kinds of barriers were set to prolong the procession.  She was finally laid to rest in the Mount Zion cemetery in Jerusalem where she was buried next to her parents.  She was a Roman Catholic.

On September 7, 2024, a young woman also from Seattle, this time a Turkish American aged 26 had gone to the West Bank for the very same reasons.  She was shot in the head by the Israeli Army.

Her name was Ayşenur Eygi.

She was also a volunteer with the ISM and had recently graduated from the University of Washington.  She and others including many Jewish activists had been demonstrating against an illegal outpost called Evyatar, an offshoot of the settlement of Beita. 

She had arrived there only two days before her untimely death by a gunfire of an Israeli soldier. Jonathan Pollack, an Israeli peace activist, participating in Friday’s protest was an eyewitness. He held her bleeding head before the ambulance arrived.  She died at the hospital.

She, like Rachel, had a full life ahead of her. 

Not only did these women want a better world but they also put their aspirations into action. They could have had a career like so many others but instead they took a different route: To be instrumental in making a change in this very unjust world of ours. 

Rachel had been born into a middle class, peace-loving family.

Ayşenur was born into a Turkish American family. She resisted and struggled for the right of a people whose livelihood and land were being stolen by settlers, guarded by the most immoral army in the world.

She was shot to death like countless others since and before October 7. 

The Americans and the Israelis did nothing to secure justice for any of these women. 

 In another part of the Middle East, on 16 September 16, 2022, a young woman named Mahsa Amini, also known by her Kurdish name Jina, went to Tehran with her brother and friends to have a good time.  She was twenty-two.   She was stopped by the morality police and taken to a van by force.  She was interrogated viciously for not having the right hijab and was hit hard on her head.  She was taken to the hospital and a few days later, after going into a coma, she was pronounced dead.  She was not political.  Her only sin was that her attire was not to the liking of the authorities.   What followed later after her shocking death was the largest uprising in Iran called Woman Life Freedom, perhaps the largest feminist movement in our time.  


Photo by Inimafoto A: https://www.pexels.com/photo/plate-with-a-slogan-woman-life-freedom-14413071/

In the Middle East and elsewhere, women have proven that they will take to the streets and encounter the oppressors to fight for freedom whether for others or themselves. 

It will not be the last time nor the only time.

Just like a century ago,  Mary Harris Jones—aka “ Mother Jones ” who was also called “the most dangerous woman in America”,  walked miles to fight for freedom and the rights of workers,  these young women also took their fight to the streets of Jerusalem, Rafah, the West Bank, Tehran and elsewhere to prove that women will not be stopped — not by guns, by bulldozers nor intimidation.

 

]]>
From the Front Lines of Nonviolence in Palestine https://www.juancole.com/2024/08/front-nonviolence-palestine.html Sun, 25 Aug 2024 04:02:20 +0000 https://www.juancole.com/?p=220204 Nonviolence Radio

A conversation from the frontlines of nonviolence in Palestine

Meet Palestinian-American activist Amira Musallam. She is resisting eviction from her family’s land by Israeli settlers while also working to bring teams of unarmed civilian protectors to Gaza and the West Bank.
 

Amira Musallam (right) with Combatants for Peace activist Mai Shahin in front of IDF soldiers. (Amira Musallam)

Subscribe to “Nonviolence Radio” on Apple Podcasts, Android, Spotify or via RSS.

( Waging Nonviolence ) – Amira Musallam is a peace activist from Beit Jalla, Palestine. She joins Nonviolence Radio to share her experiences living in the West Bank. Her family is currently facing eviction from their land by nearby Israeli settlers who are backed by the Israeli military. She is part of a exploratory team for unarmed civilian protection, or UCP, in the West Bank and Gaza. She was introduced to the power of UCP when she was 12 years old after her house was bombed by Israel (with American manufactured bombs) and a group of UCP women came to live with her family to prevent further violence and destruction. Since then, she has been actively engaged in nonviolence and UCP.

To hear Amira’s story is to hear the story of so many Palestinians who are struggling for equality and peace through nonviolence in the most heartbreaking and horrific of circumstances. Her story is an urgent call-to-action for all of us to be courageous and work in solidarity with activists on the front lines of the world’s more critical struggles for justice.

Stephanie: So, welcome everybody, to another episode of Nonviolence Radio. I’m your host, Stephanie Van Hook, and I’m here with my co-host and news anchor of the Nonviolence Report, Michael Nagler.

We are lucky to have a very special guest today, Amira Musallam. She is joining us all the way from Beit Jala in Palestine. And what’s important about this interview is that Amira is working at the front lines of nonviolence in a very violent situation, a very violent conflict.

And we think that it’s important for you, our listeners, to be able to make contact with people from around the globe who would help to tell a different story about what nonviolence is, how it works, and why nonviolence is so important in our world today, and also what’s going on in the conflict.

So, first of all, let’s bring Amira on to the show. Welcome, Amira.

Amira: Hello. Good morning.

Stephanie: Yeah, and good evening to your time. It’s 9:00.

Amira: It’s evening, here it’s good evening. But for you, good morning. Yeah.

Stephanie: Yeah. Well, thank you. It’s wonderful to have your voice here with us. As I was saying, having you as on the front lines in the conflict in Israel-Palestine, you’re going to be able to help our listeners better understand what’s going on and what you’re experiencing. So, thank you so much for joining us.

Amira: You’re welcome. Sure.

Stephanie: How did you get started as a peace activist?

Amira: Well, it started when I was 12-years-old. I live in Beit Jala. I’m American-Palestinian, by the way. I have a U.S. citizenship. I got it from my father, who lived in the States for many years. I visited the States once only, but I never lived there.

When I was 12-years-old, my house in Beit Jala was partially bombed due to the conflict. It was bombed by the Israeli tanks and Apache. And we were in the house – me and my family. And we were able to escape under the fire to our neighbor’s house, which was a more safe to hide in.

That day really affected me so much because before 2000, we used to go uphill near my house to Gilo, which is an Israeli settlement. There was no borders, no apartheid wall, nothing. And we used to play there with kids – with Israeli and Jewish kids. And it was fun, you know.

But in 2000, when the Second Intifada happened, everything changed. Everything changed. Those friends who I had in Gilo, suddenly changed into my enemies, you know? Because of our neighborhood, our town, little town of Beit Jala was bombed, and by the tanks from Gilo.

As a little girl, to see that suddenly, you know, my friends became my enemies. I was so afraid. I was terrified. We were in the house when our house was bombed. I was almost killed. My mom was shouting to – like, for somebody to hear us, to stop because we wanted to escape.

The people couldn’t come to our house to rescue us because it’s a war zone. So, like, the streets are not accessible by cars. Nothing. And so, after that day – after that night, actually, we had to leave the house for a few months until the house was fixed. And then we had a group of women coming to make a human shield or, let’s say, unarmed civilian protection.

And so, they came from England and from other countries. Their name is Woman in Black. And so, they visited us, and they stayed with us at home so they could protect us from any bombing coming to our house.

And one day we were just sitting with one of them, and she told us that a friend of hers would come to visit us. And, of course, she is welcome.

And that woman entered our house. And the moment she saw us, she started crying, and you know, and hugging us and telling us how sorry she is for what her people are doing to us. And it turned out that that woman was a Jewish-American, Israeli woman who came to protect us.

So, as a little girl, you know, I saw there is hope. There is hope that those enemies are not all of them enemies. That there are good people in this world, that those people also have good people in there.

So, since then, all the idea of hating the other just became, “No, I want to talk with the other. I want to tell them my story. I want to tell them how all my childhood was playing with them,” you know? I’m not their enemy. They shouldn’t be afraid for me. That there is another way. Armed force and bombs and attacks, you know, violent attacks from all sides is wrong. And the other way is peace, to talk, to have dialog, to listen to each other.

And that’s when I started attending all kinds of conferences and meetings with the Israelis. And since then, I became a peace activist. I worked in many different organizations when I grew up. And I became – one of my jobs was a regional project manager for a region and project with Jordan, Israel, and Palestine about water management and conflict about water in the Israeli-Palestine conflict.

Stephanie: Thank you so much for sharing your story. There’s a lot in there that I’d like to unpack for our listeners. But first of all, Michael and I both want to just share our grief with you for what you’ve endured since you were 12-years-old. This is very traumatic.

And to imagine not only having your house bombed but losing your friends and your sense of security and not knowing, not knowing what your life is anymore, where you have to leave your house. I mean, that is – it’s hard. I just want to put that in the front for a second and an honor that you’ve been through a lot.

Amira: Yeah.

Michael: Not only that, Amira, but so many people who are subject to that kind of mistreatment, and that kind of shocking reversal where friends become enemies, they themselves become bitter. And it’s a rare person who can stand above that bitterness and that disappointment and recognize the common humanity.

So, again, as Stephanie was saying, we really want to honor you for that. And we look to that kind of human response that you exemplify as our hope for the future.

Amira: Thank you. Yes.

Stephanie: You mentioned the Second Intifada. Can you explain a little of the background of the intifadas so that that’s clear on how that fits into the story?

Amira: Yes. The Second Intifada started in 2000 when Ariel Sharon, the Israeli Prime Minister, invaded the al-Aqsa Mosque with weapons, and with settlers, and so on. And people saw it as an act of humiliation. And it wasn’t so good. And that’s how that the Second Intifada started. Where people went into the streets, and they started throwing rocks at the Israeli Army.

But also, it took a really wrong and bad violent turn, which some arms from the Palestinians were used from – let’s say, Palestinian, men, fighters, freedom fighters. And normally, our fight for liberation was using nonviolent resistance and popular resistance. But in 2000, unfortunately, it took that turn and it was so bad.

We didn’t like it. Nobody liked it. People here in Palestine, they don’t want that. We want just to live in just peace and be liberated and that’s it. So, that’s the Second Intifada. It was so, so harsh. It was so difficult. And people – just like we were under Israeli – they confiscated, like the invaded cities, villages.

So many people were killed in Palestine. We had also curfews. We couldn’t leave home for many days and many hours. Yeah, the Second Intifada was terrible, I think, I believe.

Michael: You know, Gandhi at one point, Amira, said that he had three enemies. The British, which is the least of his problems, his fellow Indians, who would drop their nonviolence sometimes. And then, of course, his worst problem was Mahatma Gandhi. So, we can leave that part aside, but I am interested to hear from you about the internal struggle within the Palestinian community, about whether violence and nonviolence should be used. Could you say a little more about that?

Amira: Of course, of course I can. I am a Palestinian. I was born in Palestine. I lived with people. I know people all over, like in villages and cities in Palestine because I had to, you know, to move around.

Honestly, Palestinian people, they don’t want violence. Palestinian people, as I mentioned before, just want to live in peace.

They just want to live, you know? That’s it. As simple as that. And if you go to the streets, and you ask the most of the people, the majority will tell you, “We don’t want violence. We don’t want anybody to be killed.” Because what I believe, and what I see, that we can’t live without Israelis. And the Israelis, they can’t live without us.

Why? Because we work in Israel, for example. We build their buildings. And the economy in Israel depends on us, and we depend on them. I want to go to Israel and be allowed to go to Israel and not be afraid anymore. I want to be allowed without getting a permit, asking a permit from the military, to get me a permit to go to Jerusalem, you know? So, most of the people think like me.

Now, there is a minority, or there are people who would act violently for many reasons. One of them, some people are brainwashed. Brainwashed from fanatics, from radical – radicalism, you know? This is the most minority of people. Like, you don’t see a lot of people from this kind of people. The second type of people are those who seek revenge. So, a lot of people lost their families. They lost their kids, lost their father, mother, sister.

So, imagine, like, if you lose, someone from your family because someone killed him, not because he died, just like that, naturally. A lot of people would seek revenge. Each one of us would respond to death and killing in a different way.

If something happens to me, maybe I will respond in a – I will forgive because I’m a Christian. So, I would follow the path of Jesus, and I will forgive my enemy, you know, and the one who caused me pain.

But others, maybe they would like revenge. That’s how they will deal with their pain. So, there are lots of people like this. But of course, also, again, not the majority. And the majority, I will tell you, they don’t want revenge. They don’t want to kill. They don’t want violence. They just want to live in peace.

Stephanie: Thank you so much. For those of you who are just tuning in, you’re here at Nonviolence Radio, and we’re speaking with Amira Musallam, and she’s calling from Beit Jala in Palestine.

Amira, can you tell us about where Beit Jala is exactly? And what are the settlements that you were describing?

Amira: So, Beit Jala is part of Bethlehem Governorate. Bethlehem, where Jesus was born. And it’s a neighboring city. So, like, if you walk from Beit Jala to Bethlehem, it’s not like – it’s just crossing the street, you know? That’s how it looks like. I was born in Bethlehem, but I lived, in Beit Jala all my life. So, I’m a Bethlehemite.

Now, what’s happening with us, that I was married nine years ago to someone from Beit Jala whose family has a land in a place called Al-Makhrour. It’s the only green area left for us in Bethlehem Governorate. Why? Because since 2000, the apartheid wall just, you know, took over most of the lands of Bethlehem Governorate.

And we are in a big open-air prison. You know, we are surrounded with the apartheid wall, with the military bases, with checkpoints. And we can only move in and out from Bethlehem as a Palestinian to go to another city in the West Bank through a bypass road that was also built only for Palestinians to take it. So, everybody goes through the same street.

So, Al-Makhrour is the only green area left for us, and we have access to it. And this area is considered Area C. So, for those who don’t know, what does it mean, Area C – in Oslo – in the Oslo agreement between the Israelis and Palestinians in the ‘90s, they divided the West Bank into three zones. Area A, Area B, Area C.

So, Area A is under the civil and military control of the Palestinians. Area B is under the civil administration of Palestinians, but the military control of Israelis. Area C is under the civil and military control of Israel. Now, if we want to do anything in Area C like, you know, build an open road, do anything in construction, and so on, we need to go back to the civil administration, the Israeli civil administration.

So, this area, Area C, is the only green area. If you see it – oh, I wish, you know, there is a camera now. I can show you. It’s really lovely. It’s a lovely area with lots of olive trees, lots of fruit trees. Lots of grape, and so on.

And so, my in-laws, they have land there. They inherited it from the grandfather. And since 2011, they started their own business. It was a restaurant in the field there. It was very nice. Like, people came to this restaurant from all over the West Bank. And even Israelis would come to eat there, you know? Palestinian food and Arabic food, hummus, and so on. It’s really – it was very nice. Yeah.

And then, from 2011 until 2019 this restaurant was demolished by the Israeli military five times. For why? Because they claim that it doesn’t have a license. But anyway, if you go to the Israeli civil administration, and you applied for a license, they wouldn’t give you anyway. So, we would like build without license. Like, let’s say illegally, but it’s not really illegally because, you know, we didn’t like, build the big building or so on.

It was just very simple restaurant outdoors. Just we built the kitchen, you know. That’s the only thing that we built. And the restaurant was demolished five times from 2011 until 2019.

Also, we built a house. They told us that, “No problem, we’ll not demolish it.” And they didn’t give us the demolishing order and that. And we started paying even taxes for, you know, the Israeli government.

But unfortunately, in 2019, they came with big bulldozers and big trucks. And they destroyed – they demolished the restaurant and the house without a demolition order for the house. They just did it.

So, we went to court in 2019, to at least, prove ownership of the land and prove that, you know, my in-laws have Israeli citizenship. They are Arab-Israelis. So, we went to court to prove ownership and to start applying for a license for the house again and for the restaurant again, to rebuild them.

But we were surprised that the JFN claimed ownership also. So, we were in court against them. In 2023, just last year, we proved that the JFN doesn’t have any proof that they own the land. They didn’t prove. They didn’t bring any paper. Even the paper – the deed that they brought from the Jordanian time was fake, and we were able to prove that it was fake.

So, the Israeli court said the JFN doesn’t have any, like, right in the land while a Kisiya family, which are my in-laws, also don’t have ownership as ownership. But they can stay in the land until the original owner, who left Palestine a really long time ago in the ‘60s, can come back. Either him or one of his inheritants to claim the ownership of the land.

So, we stayed in our land. We didn’t rebuild again because we are waiting until we do it, you know, in the right way, in the legal way, getting a license, and so on. And we were there until the 31st of July.

The 31st of July we were in the land. My son, who is 9-years-old, was with his dad on the land and suddenly settlers holding weapons, came into the land, broke the big gate, started aiming weapons at my son and at my ex-husband, threatening them to leave the land. And [Jihan], my ex-husband, he was, like, telling them, like, “Listen, I’m here peacefully. I don’t have weapons. Let’s talk. Let’s talk.” He was like, raising his hands and telling them, “I’m not going to do anything. Just let’s talk. What are you doing here?”

They came without the military, without the police, without anybody. Just settlers. You know, settlers who live nearby in a settlement called Gush Etzion. And after, like, 15 to 20 minutes, police came. The army came. And they stayed there protecting the settlers, allowing them to take out all our stuff, like tables, chairs, even the kitchen. You know, anything that belongs to us, they put it out in the street with the protection of the military, of course. And they took away [Jihan] to the police station, and they gave him a restraining order for like two weeks from the land. And that’s when my in-laws called me – because it was very dangerous. My son was there with those crazy people, you know, with weapons, and so on.

And the moment I arrived to the land, my son was crying because they broke all his toys. They put them out and they broke them all. And I took him away. And I went back because my mother-in-law, sister-in-law, and father-in-law were all alone in the land.

And yeah. And if you want – if you can, like, see the social media, we have lots of videos on about the first day. You will see that those settlers were kids. Kids underage, you know. They were like 9, 10 years, 11 years with two adults with weapons. And the kids were, like, helping in removing us from the land.

So, we stayed there in the land, looking at them, trying to seek help from anybody, you know? So, that’s where I came in because I know lots of activists, lots of peace activists, lots of human rights organizations, I started calling them. And they responded. So, who responded? Most of them were Israelis who responded – Israeli activists, Jewish-Israeli activists, they came to provide UCP, which is, you know, protective presence.

So, they came after like two hours. They responded to our call. They came. They were with us in the land. We tried to talk with the military. More military came. And then the military got a military order, which was, to consider the area a closed military area. Why? Because the settlers couldn’t prove the ownership or any paper.

They didn’t have any paper. And we have our papers. We showed them to the military, but they didn’t care about our papers. So, the military said, “Okay, we will consider this area as a closed military area. Everybody should leave.” And while we were, like, leaving the land, suddenly the head – or the mayor of the Gush Etzion settlement came. Like he’s a powerful man from the settlement nearby.

He came. He was hugging and shaking hands with the military. And suddenly, after five minutes, the military order changed from the closed military area where everybody should leave, to closed military area where Palestinians should leave, and six settlers can stay in the land. You know, this is injustice. This is like really injustice. And we stayed in the land.

We tried to negotiate with the military. Like how come you are in – even the order that they brought and print out, there is nothing from that. It’s only the head of the military who gave that order.

Then they used force to kick us out. They were, you know, holding us, pushing us around until they kicked us out from the land, and they kept the settlers in our land. In our land which we have proof of ownership for – like we have paperwork from the Israeli court, while those settlers don’t have any papers.

Now, what’s their argument that they rented the land? Those settlers rented the land from the [JFN] and the [unintelligible] in 2019. The court which we won was in 2023. So, it doesn’t make sense what you are renting a land in 2019 from someone who didn’t prove ownership in 2023, you know?

But nobody cares. Like they don’t care. The army don’t care. The police don’t care. They don’t want us just to be in the land and that’s it. And since then, on a daily basis, we are in the land, we are in the area, doing nonviolent marches towards the land. Activists from, like, friends from – the Israeli friends, we talk with the police, we talk with the army, we talk with the settlers, telling them, like showing them evidence that this is wrong and what they are doing is illegal and wrong. And they are taking – they are stealing. They are not taking, they are stealing someone else’s property without any right, without any paper. And yeah, and that’s what we were doing. We have now a solidarity camp in the area near the land. Not in the land, of course because we are not allowed to enter.

And now, since then, each time we arrived to the land, they hit us, they beat us. The military, they throw at us stun grenades, teargas bombs. The settlers curse us. Tell us bad words. That’s what’s happening. But we are insisting that every day at 5:00, 5:30 in the afternoon, we are marching to the land with activists from all around. From Israel, from Palestine, foreigners from the States, you know, to show that we are here. We will not leave until we get back our land.

Stephanie: Wow, that is a horrific story of what you’re going through and what you’ve been through. This is quite a lot to take in just to hear and to imagine being in that situation with you. I’m so sorry this is happening.

Michael: One element in what you said, Amira, it does give some grounds for hope, I think. And that is that you are persisting. Because we know that in Central America, there were – this even became a rallying cry, a technical term, if you will, Firmeza Permanente. That in the end, the group that stays in its position and will not be moved will have a very good chance of prevailing. And we certainly hope that this will be your situation in time.

Amira: I hope so. I hope so. You know, this is also happening in all the West Bank, not only in Beit Jala. The problem that those settlers with the leadership of Smotrich, they are acting like lunatics, you know? Like, they don’t have any limits.

They are just stealing, killing, shooting, burning. They also, the settlers in our land, burned the area the other day while we were there to accuse us of burning the area. How come we would burn our lands, you know? We wouldn’t do that. This is our land. We have a connection with our land. This is where our memories happened, you know.

My son was born and lived in that land and in that area. So, we wouldn’t do such things, but they would. They are very aggressive. They are taking all the, you know, the okay from their leaders. And they are doing it because what they are claiming that this is the Judea and Samaria, which is a biblical area and that they should get it back because 3000 years ago, they were there, and their right is to be there again.

But okay, I’m not saying that it’s not their right. Of course, anybody can come back and live with us. With us, not against us, you know? Like with us. That’s what I always say. If those settlers came, and they wanted to live in Judea and Samaria, which is the West Bank now it’s called, we wouldn’t tell them no.

But do it in a decent way, in the right way. If somebody will sell you a land, buy it. Live there between us. We wouldn’t hurt them. But the way they are doing it makes everybody hate them, makes more violence. And more people want to be violent against them because they are being so, so, so violent. And a lot of injustice is happening there, you know?

Stephanie: I have this document here that, according to the UN office of Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, says that between October 7, 2023, and July 29, 2024, 569 Palestinians were killed in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem. And Israeli authorities demolished, confiscated, or forced the demolition of 1,311 Palestinian owned structures across the West Bank in a systemic and concerted effort during the chaos of the genocidal actions taking place in Gaza.

That because of the chaos happening in Gaza, there’s this systemic effort while our attention is on Gaza, to heighten, you know, the push in the West Bank.

Amira: Exactly. That’s what exactly happening. Like all the news is concentrating on Gaza and what is happening on Gaza. And the news, it’s not mentioning the West Bank.

Even when we are calling like press, you know, they wouldn’t really care because there is no genocide happening in the West Bank. But this is ethnic cleansing. It’s the same. Okay, they are not killing us all, but they are ethnic cleansing us. You know, like they are moving us from where we live. They want us to leave.

Like look at Bethlehem. We used to be almost 90% of Bethlehem Governorate was Christians. Look at it now. We are less than 10% Christians here. Why? Because Christians are leaving. Not because they want to leave, but because there is no life here anymore. We cannot go to our lands. We are not allowed to do anything in Area C.

Which is, now it’s like Bethlehem Area A, which I explained about, which is under the Palestinian control, is only 27% of the land of Bethlehem. The rest is under Israeli control, which we cannot do anything in it. So, you know? People are concentrating on Gaza and the Israeli military and the government the fascist government is taking advantage that everybody is busy with Gaza. And they are doing lots of horrible things. And ethnic cleansing in the West Bank. Go see the Bedouin community in the West Bank. Like every day, some communities are leaving, are leaving their place due to settler attacks.

This is horrible. This has to stop. And those settlers are not like Israeli or Jewish settlers. They are – they come from all around the world. And even they are kids. Like, the ones who are in our land are kids. What they call them, they call them like, kids at risk in the system.

So, they go to, like, rehabilitation centers and so on in Israel. And they send them to the settlements to do community work. Their community work is that, is stealing people’s land. This is horrible. This is horrific. You know, also to use their kids in such acts.

Stephanie: Yeah. You’re really giving us a picture of what – of the increasing levels of dehumanization and violence, just in terms of the areas, zones A, B and C.

I think it’s important for people who haven’t been there to understand what that’s like. To see above a village, the road going into a village, this is in Area A. And then it has a sign saying, “You could be killed if you go into this area,” meaning that the Palestinians will kill you if you go.

It’s dehumanizing. And I don’t think people understand that those signs exist and kind of making it seem like these are violent areas if you go in because they’re under Palestinian control. And then you go into areas like Area C, and you see Palestinians not being able to build their schools or have their restaurants or living in fear that their homes are being demolished or having a settlement right across the street who’s threatening their children every single day.

But then the other things that you’ve said, it’s just part of almost like the woodwork there now, but, you know, there’s a wall. There’s this gigantic concrete wall cutting through the land that tries to separate Israelis and Palestinians. And then you were saying there’s a road that only Palestinians can drive on. And that you need passes to go into certain areas.

You need to get approval before you can visit a place. Like, imagine what that would be like. In addition to the zoning of villages, I was surprised to hear that in some ways, it’s positive that the courts were working for you because I know that they don’t work for a lot of Palestinians. So, that was, you know, one development that I haven’t heard before.

Amira: The only reason that we could go to the court, because my in-laws have Israeli citizenship.

Stephanie: I see.

Amira: You know? If you’re Palestinian, like me, I am Palestinian, pure Palestinian with a Palestinian passport, goes to the Israeli court, they wouldn’t listen to me. I wouldn’t even like, you know, reach the door of the court, and then they would kick me out, you know. But that’s the good thing, yeah, for my in-laws.

Stephanie: Thank you for clarifying.

Michael: Yeah. Throughout the Middle East, there have been episodes where the judiciary was able to restore justice, protect justice, and diminish violence. And I think isn’t it interesting that now Prime Minister Netanyahu has actually attempted to neutralize the courts so that he can have absolutely unrestricted license to take over land and do these other kinds of violence?

I want to ask you, Amira, have you been working with Holy Land Trust and with Sami Awad?

Amira: Yes. I worked with Sami Awad in 2016 through 2019 in Holy Land Trust, where we worked on the regional project I mentioned before. It was three countries working together on a water matters project. Israelis, Palestinians, and Jordanians living around the Jordan Valley, from the Red to the Dead Sea, the three communities living around that area.

The project was to show how water resources are also confiscated and occupied and abused by the current situation. Like how water is accessible to Israelis but not to Palestinians. How our water, any water resource that we have, is totally controlled by Israel. And Israel would take it and then would sell us our water, you know?

So, for example, like now in Beit Jala, where I live, where we don’t have water. So, we had to buy water and fill in our tanks. Like we don’t have all the time water. We have to buy water and it’s very expensive. Imagine that. While my neighbors in Gilo, and in Jerusalem, just two minutes away from me, have Mekorot water, which is the Israeli water, which doesn’t stop at any point. And it comes from our resources, our water resources, from the Palestinians.

Michael: What you just said reminds me, Amira, of something very critical that happened in the Indian struggle, where the British were taking Indian salt. Processing it and selling it back to them. And, of course, you know, salt is almost as critical as water for human life. So, you have exactly the same dynamic. And it means that there’s a kind of vulnerability in the very injustice of it. Do you see what I mean?

No one could make a case that the British need to take away Indian salt from their own oceans and sell it back to them. So, the very glaring illogic and injustice can be a kind of weakness, if the nonviolence resistance persists.

Amira: Yes. I mean, like, I hope like more people would be willing to do like nonviolence, resistance. But sometimes it’s really difficult, believe me.

You know, I’m a believer of nonviolent resistance, and I believe that it can happen, and it can win. And it can, you know. But sometimes it’s very difficult. Just imagine putting – let’s just say this example, like putting an animal, a dog in a cage, okay? Where you control his food, his water, his life, his behavior.

And you are just putting him there and telling him, “Okay, live your life in that cage.” At some point, this dog, or this animal will become crazy, you know? Will want to attack you and kill you and bite you and so on. And this conflict is the same. If Israel wants to keep us in this open-air cage, prison, for so long, more people would want violence.

Exactly like what happened the 7th of October. I mean, I’m not giving them – I’m not saying it was a good. Of course, no. Nobody wants anybody to be killed. Nobody wants anybody – neither Jewish nor Israeli or a foreigner or whoever, to be killed. Of course, we are against what happened the 7th of October. But go back to the reason. Go back to why. You know, like go back and study the reasons why it happened and why it’s happening, and it’s still happening.

Stephanie: Often people understand that while we can’t support terrorism, we can understand it. We can learn how to understand what were the conditions that led to it. And that is so important.

You’ve been working for such a long time with UCP. Since you said you were 12 years old, in a very horrific situation. And now you’re continuing to work with UCP with an assessment team, looking to bring more people like the Women in Black, that you had worked with earlier. But talk about the assessment team and what they’re looking to do in the West Bank and Gaza.

Amira: Yes. So, we were four people. One from Canada, one from Germany and two from Palestine. Me and Sami from Palestine. We did this assessment in July. We went all over the West Bank. We conducted interviews with different people – activists, people in the political level. People from the villages around who witnessed UCP before and have experience in that.

And so, we asked this question, what if we bring now 100 activists from abroad? Would that help in protecting the civilians in the West Bank, and of course, in Gaza? What would it look like? Is it going to be a new thing, or would we just add our efforts to the people who already are on the ground and doing UCP? Should we do it now, or should we wait until the war is finished?

Also, in the case of Gaza, how would it look like? You know, it’s different than the West Bank because in the West Bank, we live – like Israelis, like settlers live among us, between us. Like you walk in the street and then suddenly you are near a settlement. And then you go to a supermarket nearby, and then you see Israelis there or settlers there.

So, it’s really different than Gaza. Gaza, it’s more like they are surrounded with Israelis, but not inside Gaza. So, what would UCP look like in Gaza? Should we send people there, or should we do it from like doing advocacy, political pressure? You know, what kind of UCP is needed in Gaza? That’s the assessment we did.

And now we are working on our report for the assessment, which will be finished soon, at the end of this month. And then with this report, we will go together to talk with the different representatives. Maybe countries. Maybe UN. Maybe, you know, we will go and discuss it and see, like tell them the results and tell them how important UCP is. And what we should do and how we need their support in that.

Stephanie: I’ve been made aware that there’s a way that people can help support that project through Nonviolence International, which is the fiscal sponsor for that project. NonviolenceInternational.net is where people can go to help support that. Amira, what were some interesting things as you’re writing, working on the report that you might be able to share of what you noticed?

Amira: Yeah. First of all, that UCP is very, very important. That UCP that happened in the past in the West Bank, in different villages, especially in South Hebron Hills. It was very successful, even though still, there are settlers and attacks and so on. But somehow it helped a lot by not expelling the people who live there.

And people are still steadfast. You know, like they are still there and living in their villages. So UCP showed – this report showed us that UCP is very important. It’s very important for the existence of the Palestinian people in their lands, in their homes. Also, it showed what is needed, really. Like for example, there are lots of the organizations doing UCP already on the ground, but it’s not really organized between them.

So, for example, X organization is doing this, Y organization is doing that in the same place, but they don’t have like coordination between them. So, like they need support in organizing things like logistical stuff, financial stuff. Like, people who would go and do the protective presence. We need cars because the areas that we do the protective presence, they are not like, easy access areas. It’s like, you know, mountains, hills, and valleys.

So, we need like 4×4 cars, for example, which most of the organizations don’t have. Or use their own cars, which are like broken from the first five minutes, you know? And this is one example, you know, from the needs. And like, lots of funding. Like people, they need lots of funding.

Like right now, I can tell you the example of the camp that we are doing in Beit Jala. So, for example, we are calling like activists to come and stay with us 24/7. But for example, there is nobody to bring us food because us, as a family, we can’t provide food because we are – we stopped working. We’re not going anymore to work to stay in the solidarity camp and to do the marches every day.

So, we need like a backup, you know, like money, to be able to cook for those people who are coming with us in solidarity. So, for example, this is like a very small example of food, transportation, gas. It’s tough to cook, you know, like these tents. Like we need a bathroom because we are outside.

There’s no infrastructure there. So, we need a remote, or whatever we can call it – bathroom. So, like, these things is very small things that adds up to the money issue. So, it’s important that people abroad, that if they can’t come and help or support, that’s what they can do. Supports us financially.

Stephanie: That’s amazing because you’ve really helped lay out the entire – a broader vision of how people can support. So, even if they were to come over and say they didn’t become an unarmed civilian protection person, they could also come and help drive a car, or they could help get food made or brought, bring food. There’s a number of other things that people can do, if they don’t feel that they’re being called to be a UCP presence, but that they can still help even from whatever other country they’re in, they can give financial support to the project for all of these daily life needs of the teams and of people that are working on nonviolence, which is important.

Amira: Yes. And also, one important thing that I have to add is advocacy. Advocacy is very important. Like people who have been to Palestine and Israel, when they go back to their countries, just don’t stay there and sit and say, “I once visited Palestine and Israel, and I saw the checkpoints,” and so on. No, go and talk about it, you know? Talk with your community, with your – maybe in universities, in schools, and then in your, you know, barbecue nights with your friends. You know, to tell people what’s going on on the other side of the world because it’s all connected.

It’s all connected. If this area stays like this, all the world is going to – going to really a – bad, bad things. So, I think everybody should talk about it, whoever is interested in this case. And I can help, and many people can help. There are plenty of organizations who talk about the conflict, about what’s happening. You can, you know, Google, and then you have so many organizations who can tell you and give you firsthand information about the situation and what’s happening.

Stephanie: Yeah. I was quite surprised, Amira, after October 7th, when papers started reporting on what life is like in the West Bank and what was happening with the settlements. So many people were surprised, and they didn’t know that was happening, that there was this very intense escalation of violence on a daily basis from the Israeli government on Palestinians, especially in the West Bank. People didn’t know that. So, not to take anything for granted that people understand what’s going on there.

Amira: I totally understand. Like when I talk with people who come, like they meet me for the first time, and I tell them I’m a Christian Palestinian, also they are surprised. Even lots of people in the States, they don’t know that we exist here.

Come on, you know? Like really, some people, they asked me, when did you become a Christian? I tell them I was born. I never became a Christian. I am a Christian because I was born. Since my great-great-great-great grandfather, you know? My grandfather was the mayor of Bethlehem. My ancestors are Bethlehemite Christians from Bethlehem where Jesus was born, like Bethlehem is Christian. Come on.

So, this is like, to that extent, people don’t know about us, about Palestine, about the conflict. Israel doesn’t differentiate us from others. Like they treat us as Palestinians. They don’t give us like special treatment because we are Christians. No. For them, we are Palestinians.

They don’t care. You know, like my house was bombed. Our land is being taken. I have to go to Jerusalem, which is just five minutes from Bethlehem. I need a permit from the Israeli government to cross the checkpoint and go to church in Jerusalem, you know? Even if I have an American passport, I still can’t go, you know? I’m not allowed. Like, if you come to, to visit me, then you can go alone to Jerusalem. I can’t go with you. Even if I’m American. So, yeah, it’s really terrible.

Michael: Yeah. We experienced that ourselves. A friend of ours drove us up to Bethlehem, but had to stop and go back while we went in.

I just want to make one final comment, Amira, and that is that this kind of extreme violence that you’ve been describing is often its own undoing. That historically, if you look back at, you know, a couple of centuries, more centuries, what you see is people think that by being extremely violent they’re going to prevail. They’re going to be secure. They’re going to get what they want. But it always backfires. So, it’s very harmful.

There’s no way of getting around the pain and the risk. But in the long run, I want to say that I believe you are in a stronger position, and we wish you every success.

Amira: Thank you. Thank you.

Stephanie: Amira, thank you so much for joining us today on Nonviolence Radio. I have this, letter from Mel Duncan, who’s also working on the outreach in the creation of this project for UCP.

And he suggests that people tell your story who have heard this, contact their representatives and senators in the US. That they call the State Department and talk about your situation. Demand that the US Embassy in Jerusalem intervene, that it has to stop supporting Israeli expansion on the West Bank. Demand an immediate cease fire in Gaza and stop any further arms shipments to Israel. I’m sure you can. People can find out more about this at NonviolenceInternational.net. Amira Mussallam, thank you so much for joining us today.

Amira: Thank you. Thank you very much. Bye.

Stephanie: Bye. For those of you just tuning in, or have been listening, you’re here at Nonviolence Radio, and we’ve been speaking with Amira Mussallam from Beit Jala, Palestine, about nonviolence in Palestine, and Israel-Palestine, and in the West Bank, and her situation on the front lines of that conflict.

If you want to learn more about nonviolence, go to MettaCenter.org. And you can find archives of this show at NonviolenceRadio.org.

We want to thank our mother stations, KPCA and KWMR. To Matt and Robin Watrous who are going to transcribe this show, thank you very much. Sophia Pechaty, Annie Hewitt, Bryan Farrell over at Waging Nonviolence, the show is syndicated there, also across the Pacifica Network.

Thank you to all community radio supporters. A special thank you to Amira Mussallam for her interview. Mel Duncan for putting us in contact. And to you, all of our listeners, until the next time, as we way, please take care of one another.

Via Waging Nonviolence



]]>
Gaza is in Rubble now; But it was a great Intellectual Hub of the Roman Empire https://www.juancole.com/2024/08/rubble-intellectual-empire.html Tue, 20 Aug 2024 04:02:41 +0000 https://www.juancole.com/?p=220053 By Christopher Mallan, The University of Western Australia | –

(The Conversation) – The years 2023 and 2024 will certainly be remembered as some of the darkest in the long and often violent history of Gaza.

The recent destruction of schools and universities in the Gaza strip has attracted the attention of the media and concern from the United Nations, which has raised the question of whether the damage may be considered “scholasticide”.

Such reports are cause for reflection on the intellectual history of the city – something rarely discussed outside academic circles. This is a shame, as there was a period in the late Roman Empire (5th and 6th centuries CE) when Gaza was one of the great intellectual centres of the Mediterranean world.

Gaza and the Roman Empire

This history of Gaza under the Roman Empire dates from the re-foundation of the city in the 60s BCE, after it had been destroyed decades earlier by Alexander Jannaeus (the ruler of the neighbouring Kingdom of Judaea), as narrated by the Jewish historian Josephus.

Under the relative peace of the Roman Empire, the city was no longer prey to the imperial attentions of its more powerful neighbours, be they Egyptian, Greek, Judaean, or indeed Roman. Gazans were able to capitalise on their position on one of the great geographical crossroads.

Gaza and surrounding towns as depicted in the mosaic ‘Madaba Map’ (located in Jordan) dated to the 6th century CE.
Wikimedia

Gaza was positioned on the major route from Egypt to the historic cities of the Levant, which correspond to modern-day Lebanon, Jordan, Israel and Syria. It also provided access to the Mediterranean Sea at the end of one of the major trade routes from Arabia, via the city of Petra.

Gaza seems to have primarily been a commercial centre until sometime in the 5th century, at which point it became noteworthy for its schools as well as its trade.

Between pagan and Christian

The Late Roman Middle East was a hotbed of intellectual activity.

During this time the schools of Alexandria (in Egypt), Constantinople (Istanbul), Antioch (Antakya) and Gaza can be thought of as the Ivy League of their day.

Although there were no formal universities as we think of them today, these ancient intellectual centres hosted famous teachers who would attract the best and brightest of the Roman elite.

If you wanted to make it in the Late Roman World (and if you didn’t command an army of Goths), your entry into the civil administration of the newly powerful Christian Church was largely determined by your education.

We know quite a bit about the educational syllabus of the Gazan schools. At the heart of this elite ancient education was the study of literature and rhetoric.

The curriculum focused on Classical Greek texts (as opposed to Latin or Syriac ones). Young men would be taught how to compose speeches on various topics.

In some instances these speeches would address the emperor. But these speeches were not only exercises in flattery; we know of one school teacher, Timothy of Gaza (or grammatikos, to use his Greek title), who wrote a speech addressed to the Emperor Anastasius (who reigned between 491–518 CE) petitioning him to abolish the tax on merchants.

The emperor Anastasius (centre) alongside his wife Ariadne (right) on a 517 CE diptych of his grandnephew (bottom).
Wikimedia

Other examples of Gazan eloquence were less obviously political. The bulk of the curriculum involved writing on themes suggested by ancient Greek literature, mythology or history.

The retention of pagan (in this case non-Christian) elements in the syllabus is important. As a rule, the Later Roman Empire was not noted for its religious tolerance, whether between Christians and non-Christians, or between Christians of differing theological persuasions.

We know from an ancient biography of a 5th-century bishop named Porphyry that this bishop participated in the demolition of the remaining pagan temples in Gaza. Yet, as a whole, Gazan intellectuals were able to balance their Christian beliefs with their love of Classical (pagan) culture.

At least two Christian Gazan intellectuals, whose works survive, explore Biblical accounts of creation written in the style of Plato’s dialogues from the 4th century BCE. These works incorporate predominantly pagan neo-Platonic philosophy with Christian interpretations.

Procopius and the wondrous clock

The greatest, or at any rate the most influential, of the Gazan intelligentsia was Procopius of Gaza. Procopius was a prolific writer and teacher. He is thought to have invented a type of biblical commentary, known as a catena, which linked passages of earlier scholars in a sort of precursor to today’s Bible commentaries.

However, if there is one work that sums up the educational endeavours of the schools of Gaza while also presenting a picture of the city, it is Procopius’ description of Gaza’s clock.

One of the important exercises in Roman education was learning how to describe an object, something called ekphrasis. Procopius’ ekphrasis of the clock became something of a textbook example of this and caught the attention of ancient readers.

The clock itself was a mechanical marvel. Situated in Gaza’s main marketplace, it seems to have been a monumental version of a cuckoo clock with a figure of Hercules appearing on the hour.

Hercules’ appearance at each hour corresponded to one of his mythical labours, whether that be the slaying of the Nemean lion or the clearing of the Augean stables.

Procopius likens the (otherwise unknown) inventor of this clock to a latter-day Hephaestus – the Greek god of craft. The clock’s mechanism was driven by water power.

This clock, like the famous schools of Late Roman Gaza, eventually disappeared. We don’t know when this occurred, but the centuries after Gaza’s intellectual golden age saw a return of conflict.

Almost 1,500 years have passed since the days of Procopius, his students and the engineer who designed the clock. Yet Gaza remains a living city, with poets and teachers.

One may hope that in the near future the modern schools of Gaza will reopen and intellectual life will once more be allowed to flourish.The Conversation

Christopher Mallan, Associate Professor in Classics and Ancient History, The University of Western Australia

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Featured Image: The ‘Medaba Map’ (6th century CE) is part of a floor mosaic in the church of Saint George in Madaba, Jordan, containing the oldest surviving cartographic depiction of Jerusalem.
Wikimedia/Paul Palmer

]]>
US Data Shows Continued Surge in Hate Against Muslims, Palestinians https://www.juancole.com/2024/08/against-muslims-palestinians.html Thu, 01 Aug 2024 04:06:34 +0000 https://www.juancole.com/?p=219787 By Jessica Corbett | –

As Israel’s U.S.-backed war on Gaza continues, university administrators, employers, and federal agencies are contributors to rising complaints of Islamophobia.

( Commondreams.org ) – A spike in “relentless” Islamophobia across the United States that began in October with Israel’s U.S.-backed attack on the Gaza Strip continued through the first half of this year, the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy group said Tuesday.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) released data showing the sustained surge in anti-Muslim and anti-Palestinian hate from January to June 2024, with 4,951 documented complaints, a 69% increase over the same period in 2023.

That came after CAIR received 3,578 complaints from last October through December, a 178% increase from a similar three-month period the previous year, as Common Dreamsreported when the data was published in January.

The largest share of 2024 complaints related to immigration and asylum cases (19%), which is in line with 2023. That was followed by employment discrimination (14%), education discrimination (10%), and hate crimes and incidents (8%).

So far this year, May has had the largest number of education discrimination complaints—which CAIR tied to “university administrations cracking down on anti-genocide student protestors,” beginning with Columbia University in April.

“Too many places of higher education, which have historically permitted Islamophobic speakers to poison their campus in the name of academic freedom, apparently find anti-genocide speech intolerable,” said CAIR research and advocacy director Corey Saylor in a statement. “Since last fall university administrators have been a primary perpetrator of anti-Muslim racism.”

“Our data shows that as student protests dominated media coverage of the movement opposing the Gaza genocide, employers also continued punishing their employees for their viewpoints,” Saylor added. “We are also seeing federal agencies like Customs and Border Protection and the FBI interpreting being Muslim or anti-genocide as suspicious activity.”

 

CAIR’s data release followed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to the United States last week to address Congress—which was boycotted by dozens of lawmakers—and meet privately with President Joe Biden; Vice President Kamala Harris, the presumptive Democratic nominee for the November election; and former President Donald Trump, the Republican candidate.

Enabled by weapons and diplomatic support from Biden and Congress, Netanyahu launched Israel’s ongoing assault of Gaza in retaliation for the deadly Hamas-led October 7 attack. As of Tuesday, Israeli forces have killed at least 39,400 Palestinians and wounded another 90,996, according to local officials—though experts anticipate the final death toll will be far higher.

South Africa is leading a genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice, which ruled on July 19 that the decadeslong Israeli occupation of Gaza and the West Bank is illegal and must end. United Nations human rights experts said Tuesday that Israel must comply with the ruling, though Netanyahu’s government has shown no signs that it plans to do so.

CAIR has labeled the recent rise in hate across the United States “the Biden-backed Gaza genocide Islamophobia wave.”

“Islamophobia in the U.S. comes in cycles, with the last two large waves generated by Donald Trump’s 2015 announcement and 2017 implementation of his Muslim ban,” the group explained Tuesday. “As we have noted previously, this wave exceeds the combined totals of incoming incidents received during those two cycles.”

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).

]]>
When will Americans let the Palestinian People have their Fourth of July? https://www.juancole.com/2024/07/americans-palestinian-people.html Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:10:38 +0000 https://www.juancole.com/?p=219386 Revised.

Ann Arbor (Informed Comment) – Americans are commemorating the Fourth of July today, the anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Implicit in this holiday is the recognition of the right of a people to self-determination.

The grievances that the four million inhabitants of British North America had in 1776 were not felt by them to be narrow or specific but rather universal, and so too was the remedy. They laid against the government of King George III that it was not serving the interests of its North American subjects.

Thomas Jefferson wrote,

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

All human beings are created equal, the founders of the United States believed.

That means that Palestinians, as human beings, are also created equal. The text says “all.”

Moreover, the Palestinians by virtue of being “men” (i.e. human beings) have been endowed by God with the rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

In today’s world, the Palestinians do not have any of these rights, whether God wants them to or not. They were successively ethnically cleansed from their homeland of Palestine by militant Jewish settlers. (There were no Jews in Palestine to speak of as recently as 1800; Bonaparte found about 3,000 when he invaded in 1799, I think; Palestine was inhabited by Muslim and Christian Palestinians and as late as 1939 the British mandatory authorities envisaged a Palestinian state run by independent Palestinians in 1949). Some 750,000 Palestinians were expelled from what became Israel by Zionist forces with no compensation and their land and property usurped in 1948. More tens of thousands were displaced in 1967. Their numbers have grown. Some 21 percent of Israel is remnants of the original Palestinian inhabitants, some 2 million persons. They are second class citizens in many ways.

But the some 5 million Palestinians who live in the West Bank and Gaza, and the several hundred thousand living in Lebanese refugee camps, are living lives the opposite of the ones Jefferson declared natural. They are stateless. In the West Bank they live under Israeli military rule; there are a few civil institutions, but all of these can be over-ruled by the whim of the Israeli army. Palestinians do not control their land, water or air.

Julia Frankel at the Associated Press reported Wednesday, “Israel turbocharges West Bank settlement expansion with largest land grab in decades.” Note that some of this newly stolen land was explicitly promised to the Palestine Authority in the Oslo Peace Accords, which Bill Clinton signed and guaranteed. But the Biden administration won’t lift a finger to stop this injustice.

According to the Gaza ministry of health, “at least 37,900 Palestinians have been reported killed in the Gaza Strip since 7 October. Another 87,060 Palestinians have been reported injured” in 2023-2024. The majority of those killed and injured have been women and children, and many of the remaining deaths were among noncombatant men. Israel has dropped some 500 two thousand pound bombs on Gaza, flattening residential complexes and destroying a majority of the housing stock, often striking in the absence of any obvious military target, according to the UN.

Before that, the Israelis had put the Palestinians under siege, including the children and non-combatants in general. They weren’t allowed to export virtually anything they produce. They had (and have) no port or airport (both bombed by Israel). They suffered from massive unemployment and even malnutrition, which the 2023-2024 total war made worse. The Israelis had placed the Palestinians of Gaza in a huge open-air concentration camp. With American and European help.

The British are estimated to have killed 1 percent of the American population 1776-1882. Israel has already killed nearly 2 percent of the Palestinian population of Gaza in roughly nine months of war.

In the phrase of former SCOTUS Chief Justice Earl Warren, the stateless have no right to have rights. They do not have the right to life, or liberty, or the pursuit of happiness. They may be killed with impunity (the Israeli army has killed 9 Palestinians, including children, in its crackdown on the West Bank over the horrific kidnapping and killing of three Israeli youth. The horrid character of the crime does not authorize Israel to engage in collective punishment nor Israelis to act as vigilantes and deprive other people of life or liberty.)

So the Palestinians do not have a right to life. They have no liberty at all as the US founding generation conceived it. And they certainly have no right to pursue happiness. Their lives are constrained and made difficult by deliberate actions of Israeli officials and officers and armed squatters on their land who torment them.

The Declaration of Independence insists that people have a right to elect their government. But Palestinians cannot elect the Israeli government, which actually rules them (and they cannot elect the Lebanese government either, where there is a significant Palestinian refugee population). The elections held after the Oslo process have been undone by deliberate Israeli intransigence. When Palestinians vote for the Palestine Authority, in any case, they are not actually getting representation that matters. The PA only polices 40% of the West Bank, and it is routinely overruled by the Israeli military. The Israeli equivalent of Red Coats, the Israeli military, still controls their land, air and sea. Increasingly, in addition, the Israeli equivalent of neo-Nazis in the cabinet of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have been given control of police and administration in the West Bank, eclipsing the occupation army.

The early Americans were angry that King George III took away land at will, which is something the Israelis routinely do to the Palestinians. They also minded that he appointed the court judges. The Palestinians have no courts in which to adjudicate their claims, being forced to litigate in front of unsympathetic Israeli judges.

Did the Americans mind that the king was “cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world?” Israelis are doing that to the Palestinians. Were they angry at him “for depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury”? The Israelis arrest and hold people for a very long time without any judicial process, a travesty they call “administrative detention.” The Israeli parliament just advanced a bill that would specify that Jewish squatters in the Palestinian West Bank cannot be held under administrative detention with no habeas corpus– that the practice is only directed at Palestinians. This kind of discrimination is why major human rights bodies accuse Israel of Apartheid.

The remedy the early Americans applied to these problems, of rising up against foreign occupying troops, is not available to Palestinians. The Israelis are too strong, too well armed, and too backed to the hilt by the US Congress, many members of which use Israel for their white nationalist purposes. Opposing the Israeli occupation is routinely equated in the US to “terrorism,” even though Palestinians are the aggrieved party. But in any case, the Declaration of Independence does not say all men are created equal except those that have some violent people among them. And King George III saw the American revolutionaries as terrorists, too.

The horrible thing is that US diplomacy and US taxpayers’ money is going toward keeping the Palestinians stateless and without rights. Americans are doing to a helpless people exactly the kinds of things they wouldn’t put up with from King George III for themselves.

Americans don’t have a responsibility to liberate everyone in the world. But they do have a responsibility not to help Israel deprive Palestinians of their inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

]]>
Hostage Families demand Deal, Netanyahu Resignation, in Largest Demonstrations since Oct. 7 https://www.juancole.com/2024/06/netanyahu-resignation-demonstrations.html Sun, 23 Jun 2024 05:17:19 +0000 https://www.juancole.com/?p=219202 Ann Arbor (Informed Comment) – Saturday evening witnessed the biggest Israeli demonstrations against the government led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu since the outbreak of war on October 7, 2023, according to the Israeli press as summarized by Al Jazeera. Some 150,000 are said to have rallied in Tel Aviv alone. They demanded that the prime minister resign.

Some demonstrators actually set a fire in front of the headquarters of the ruling Likud Party, which Netanyahu heads.

The first nine months of 2023 saw regular massive rallies against Netanyahu and his cabinet, which includes elements that are the Israeli equivalent of neo-Nazis. The horrid Oct. 7 attacks by Hamas caused Israelis to pull together and the demonstrations ceased for a long time, with a war cabinet having been formed that included opposition members. Earlier in June, however, Benny Gantz resigned from the war cabinet, essentially a government of national unity, and Netanyahu has now dissolved it. Gantz, a retired general, leads the centrist opposition National Unity Party.

On Saturday Gantz joined in a demonstration in the town of Kiryat Gat in the Southern District, demanding a hostage deal.

Some of the renewed opposition derives from Netanyahu’s refusal to cease bombing Gaza long enough to conclude a hostage exchange agreement with Hamas. The terrorist organization continues to hold an estimated 120 Israelis who were taken hostage on October 7, a mixture of civilians and military, of men and women, and of Israelis and guest workers (some from Thailand).

The families with members who remain prisoners in Gaza’s tunnels have concluded that there is not hope of a hostage deal as long as the current extremist government remains in power. At a news conference near the Ministry of Defense in Tel Aviv, hostage families announced that Netanyahu’s government has to fall before the hostages can be brought out.

Channel 13 carried an interview with hostage families who asserted that Netanyahu does not want a hostage deal because he knows that their return would signal the fall of his government.

Al Jazeera English Video: “‘All of the rats in the Knesset’: Mass antiwar protest in Israel”

Netanyahu is on trial for corruption and were he to lose the position of prime minister and become a civilian again, the trials would go forward and he could be jailed. One of his predecessors as prime minister, Ehud Olmert, went to prison for corruption. The Israeli prosecutors and police don’t play.

President Joe Biden told an interviewer that it would be legitimate to suspect that Netanyahu carries on the nine-month Gaza campaign because he wants to remain in power.

Warrants have been sought against Netanyahu for war crimes by the International Criminal Court.

Netanyahu’s maximalist goal of “destroying Hamas” was brought into question this week by military spokesman Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari, who said, “Hamas is an idea, Hamas is a party, it is embedded in the hearts of people. Whoever thinks that we can make Hamas disappear is mistaken. It is the Muslim Brotherhood, which has been in this area for a great many years.” He said the most you could do is set up an effective rival to it that would provide aid to people and then publicize that this alternative, not Hamas, was doing effective charity work.

Hagari said that anyone who spoke about destroying Hamas was deceiving the public.

That assertion seemed to many observers a not very veiled reference to Netanyahu.

Yediot Aharanot columnist Nadav Eyal wrote in mid-June, “The IDF believes that the tactical achievement allows Israel to ‘pass a phase,’ and in fact to end the war in Gaza through an agreement to return the kidnapped. ‘The end of the war is not the end of the fighting,’ say security officials, ‘the intelligence will continue to flow and so will the possibility of attacking from the air or from the ground.” [Google translate.; h/t for cite BBC Monitoring.]

This increasing split between the extremist government, with its fascist elements that insist on a forever war in Gaza, and the Israeli officer corps, is momentous and perhaps gives the protesters hope.

However, in a parliamentary system Netanyahu can stay in power until 2026 as long as his coalition retains a majority and he can avoid a vote of no confidence. Israeli civil society is too weakened by decades of Likud Party Neoliberalism to intervene effectively.

]]>
How rich Philanthropists exert undue Influence over pro-Palestinian Activism at Universities https://www.juancole.com/2024/06/philanthropists-palestinian-universities.html Tue, 04 Jun 2024 04:02:24 +0000 https://www.juancole.com/?p=218904 By Fahad Ahmad, Toronto Metropolitan University qne Adam Saifer, University of British Columbia | –

(The Conversation) On university campuses across North America, a new anti-war movement has emerged. Camped-out students are pressuring their universities to divest from companies that profit off the Israeli war machine, to cut ties with Israeli institutions and to publicly condemn Israel’s deadly military campaign in Gaza.

Away from the student encampments, unsympathetic alumni and donors are pressuring university administrators to suppress this student movement.

New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft announced he would cease donations to Columbia University. Hedge-fund billionaire Bill Ackman, dissatisfied with Harvard University administration’s response to a student statement criticizing Israel, led a highly publicized campaign to oust the university’s first Black president, Claudine Gay.

At Toronto Metropolitan University, several donors threatened to withhold scholarships and donations to the law school in response to a student letter in solidarity with Palestinians.

More recently, Ernest Rady, the man behind the University of Manitoba’s largest-ever donation, publicly condemned the convocation address delivered by the medical school’s valedictorian.

The valedictorian called for a ceasefire, humanitarian aid to Gaza and an end to the killing of Palestinian medical professionals and journalists. The university responded by denouncing the valedictory speech and removing it from their media channels.

Donor influence over university policy on pro-Palestinian student protests is an alarming case of the growing footprint of private philanthropy in higher education. It poses a grave risk to free inquiry, critical thinking and the democratic ideals of universities.

Philanthropy goes beyond mere do-gooding

Philanthropy refers to the mobilization of private resources for the public good.

WXYZ Detroit Video: “Protesters speak after encampment is raided at Wayne State Univeristy”

As governments have scaled back public spending, philanthropists have stepped in. They are widely celebrated for making financial contributions to social, cultural and educational institutions.

For example, the Gates Foundation has been praised for spending billions on health and education. The names of billionaire businessmen like Schulich, Sprott and Munk grace post-secondary institutions across Canada.

Our work, however, shows that philanthropy’s “goodness myth” obscures the fact that “philanthropic wealth and power emerge through social relations of colonial and capitalist accumulation, which produce the very societal harms … that are the target of philanthropic interventions.”

Scholars have long cautioned against philanthropy’s undemocratic and unaccountable nature. Stanford political scientist Robert Reich calls it “a plutocratic exercise of power.”

Philanthropic donations are publicly subsidized through charitable tax receipts. However, spending is directed according to donors’ preferences. Philanthropy therefore allows wealthy people to exchange financial capital for social and symbolic capital. This grants philanthropists undue influence over public policy, including matters related to post-secondary education.

Mega-donations and Canadian universities

The neoliberal turn in higher education has resulted in a stagnation or decline in provincial funding to post-secondary institutions.

In addition to raising student fees and cutting costs, universities are seeking philanthropic donations to fill funding gaps. These donations boost university trust, capital, endowment and research funds, even though they constitute a small portion of university revenues.

Canadian universities’ growing dependence on philanthropic donations coincides with a significant expansion in the number and size of philanthropic foundations.

Foundations are charitable institutions used by the wealthy to make donations. From 2013 to 2022, the total assets of philanthropic foundations in Canada rose from approximately $56 billion to $123 billion. This growth ushered in a new era of “mega-donations” to universities. In just the last five years, the University of Toronto, Queen’s University, the University of Waterloo and McGill University have received individual donations of $100 million or more.

Mega-donations provide post-secondary institutions with the financial resources to help them realize their goals. In the process, however, university administrators are rendered accountable to the whims and political priorities of wealthy philanthropists. When balancing donor interests against their own academic principles and organizational priorities, the balance all too often tips in favour of the donors.

In 2020, for example, the dean of the University of Toronto Faculty of Law blocked the hiring of a human rights scholar in response to pressure from a major donor (and sitting judge) who disapproved of the scholar’s research on Israel/Palestine.

The need to increase public funding

Scholars of the philanthropic sector have long pointed to the power imbalances in donor-grantee relationships. Philanthropy is uniquely characterized by upward accountability — institutions like universities that are reliant on big donations are compelled to sacrifice the needs of students and faculty at the altar of donor wishes and priorities. Administrators are driven by fear of losing philanthropic funding.

Philanthropists clearly understand this power when they demand that post-secondary institutions discipline student protests supporting Palestine.

When university administrators accede to donor demands, they punish students for enacting the core values and principles their institutions profess. This cultivates the conditions for wealthy elites to introduce their ideological biases into public academic institutions.

There is a long history of wealthy people controlling organizations and institutions through giving and withholding donations. Elites across the political spectrum have used their philanthropy to un-democratically shape public policy and “capture” social movements.

This structural dependence on philanthropy explains why donors are able to pressure university administrators into suppressing the anti-war student movement against Israel’s campaign in Gaza. Safeguarding against this creep of private forces into the university requires a recommitment to increased public funding of post-secondary education.The Conversation

Fahad Ahmad, Assistant Professor, Department of Criminology, Toronto Metropolitan University and Adam Saifer, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management, University of British Columbia

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

]]>